knowledgewisdomKnowledge Contributor
In what scenarios would a company prefer marginal costing over absorption costing?
In what scenarios would a company prefer marginal costing over absorption costing?
Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Questions | Answers | Discussions | Knowledge sharing | Communities & more.
Marginal Costing vs. Absorption Costing:
Marginal costing focuses on variable costs associated with producing additional units, while fixed overhead costs are treated as period costs and are not allocated to products. In contrast, absorption costing assigns both variable and fixed manufacturing costs to products, resulting in a higher cost per unit compared to marginal costing when inventory levels increase. Marginal costing is preferred for short-term decision-making, such as pricing and product mix decisions, as it provides a clearer picture of contribution margin and profitability at different activity levels.