Sikta RoyKnowledge Contributor
Analyze the potential of geoengineering approaches, such as solar radiation management and carbon dioxide removal, to mitigate climate change, and discuss the associated risks and ethical considerations.
Analyze the potential of geoengineering approaches, such as solar radiation management and carbon dioxide removal, to mitigate climate change, and discuss the associated risks and ethical considerations.
Geoengineering approaches like solar radiation management (SRM) and carbon dioxide removal (CDR) offer potential strategies to mitigate climate change. SRM aims to reflect a portion of solar radiation to cool the Earth, while CDR focuses on removing CO2 from the atmosphere. While these approaches could provide temporary relief or complement emission reduction efforts, they carry significant risks, including unintended climatic side effects, disruptions to weather patterns, and impacts on biodiversity. Ethical considerations involve governance, potential for unequal impacts, and the moral hazard of reducing incentives for emission reductions. Comprehensive research and international collaboration are crucial for evaluating the feasibility and risks of geoengineering.